Ads
Anthony Albanese should prioritize listening to young people rather than prohibiting them from using social media. As a member of Generation Z, social media has played a significant role in shaping my life and the lives of my peers. I have grown up in a world where social media is an integral part of daily life, providing connection, information, and opportunities for activism.
The recent proposal by the Albanese government to ban minors under the age of 16 from using social media platforms has sparked controversy and concern among young people. As someone who has relied on social media for news, communication, and activism, I believe that this proposal is misguided and fails to consider the important role that social media plays in the lives of young people today.
Research has shown that social media is a primary source of news for many teenagers and children, providing them with access to information and perspectives that are crucial for their understanding of the world. By prohibiting young people from using social media, the government would be cutting them off from a valuable resource for learning and engaging with important issues.
While it is important to ensure that social media platforms promote respectful and non-toxic content, banning young people from using these platforms is not the solution. Instead, we should focus on providing them with the education and support they need to navigate social media in a positive and healthy way.
The government’s proposal to establish a “digital duty of care” for social media companies is a step in the right direction, as it highlights the need for these companies to prioritize the mental health and well-being of their users. However, it is important to ensure that this duty of care is applied in a way that respects the rights and autonomy of young people, rather than restricting their access to information and communication.
It is also worth noting that the government’s rejection of a climate duty of care for young people contradicts its stated commitment to safeguarding their well-being. By prioritizing the views and input of adults over those of young people, the government is failing to listen to the voices that will be most affected by its policies.
As a youth activist, I have witnessed the power of social media to mobilize young people and effect positive change. Through platforms like Instagram and TikTok, we have been able to reach a wide audience and educate them about important issues, empowering them to take action and make a difference in their communities.
Student activism is a crucial part of any democracy, allowing young people to engage with the world around them and advocate for change. By restricting their access to social media, the government would be limiting their ability to participate in political discourse and online activism, undermining their personal and political agency.
Rather than imposing blanket bans on young people, the government should work collaboratively with youth to develop policies that promote safe and respectful use of social media. By listening to the voices of young people and empowering them to engage in meaningful ways, we can create a more inclusive and supportive environment for all members of society.
In conclusion, Anthony Albanese should prioritize listening to young people and involving them in the decision-making process regarding social media regulations. By working together to create a platform that fosters respect, understanding, and collaboration, we can ensure that young people have the tools they need to thrive in a digital world. Let us seize this opportunity to empower the next generation and build a brighter future for all.
